A10-4657M vs i5-3337U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3337U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.37
+19.1%

Core i5-3337U outperforms A10-4657M by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22482391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD A-Series
Power efficiency7.353.00
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1023BGA
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3337U 1.37
+19.1%
A10-4657M 1.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3337U 2093
+19%
A10-4657M 1759

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 1.15
Integrated graphics card 1.18 1.23
Recency 1 January 2013 1 April 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

i5-3337U has a 19.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

A10-4657M, on the other hand, has 4.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores.

The Core i5-3337U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4657M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3337U and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3337U
Core i5-3337U
AMD A10-4657M
A10-4657M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 382 votes

Rate Core i5-3337U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3337U or A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.