Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i5-3230M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3230M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.66
Ryzen 9 3900XT
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
21.15
+1174%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms i5-3230M by a whopping 1174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1985236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Matisse 2 (2020)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$499
Current price$93 (0.4x MSRP)$355 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size118 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3230M 1.66
Ryzen 9 3900XT 21.15
+1174%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-3230M by 1174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-3230M 2560
Ryzen 9 3900XT 32706
+1178%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-3230M by 1178% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-3230M 509
Ryzen 9 3900XT 1734
+241%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-3230M by 241% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-3230M 1024
Ryzen 9 3900XT 10072
+884%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-3230M by 884% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 21.15
Recency 1 January 2013 16 June 2020
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 4 24
Cost $225 $499
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 9 3900XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3230M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-3230M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 3900XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 9 3900XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3230M
Core i5-3230M
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Ryzen 9 3900XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1025 votes

Rate Core i5-3230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 406 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3230M or Ryzen 9 3900XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.