A10-7400P vs i5-2560M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2560M
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.51
+14.4%
A10-7400P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.32

Core i5-2560M outperforms A10-7400P by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21382251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Kaveri
Power efficiency4.083.57
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB4096 KB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size149 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data102 °C
Number of transistors624 Million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataFP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2560M 1.51
+14.4%
A10-7400P 1.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2560M 2397
+14.1%
A10-7400P 2100

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 1.32
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

i5-2560M has a 14.4% higher aggregate performance score.

A10-7400P, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-2560M is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7400P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2560M and A10-7400P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2560M
Core i5-2560M
AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Core i5-2560M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2560M or A10-7400P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.