Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs i5-2547M
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 495 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i5 | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
Power efficiency | no data | 48.77 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 54 MHz |
Multiplier | 16 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
L3 cache | 3 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 149 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 624 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | no data | FP8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon 880M |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.66 | 20.18 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
i5-2547M has -75% more threads.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has 2957.6% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2547M and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.