i5-750 vs i5-2540M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2540M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.49
Core i5-750
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.59
+6.7%

Core i5-750 outperforms Core i5-2540M by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21602107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5Core i5 (Desktop)
Power efficiency4.031.58
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)8 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$266$150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s2500 MHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size149 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C73 °C
Number of transistors624 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2540M 1.49
i5-750 1.59
+6.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2540M 2367
i5-750 2533
+7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-2540M 490
+16.4%
i5-750 421

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-2540M 980
i5-750 1171
+19.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-2540M 4171
+20.6%
i5-750 3458

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-2540M 9109
i5-750 11048
+21.3%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-2540M 3682
i5-750 4320
+17.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-2540M 17.23
i5-750 12.06
+42.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-2540M 3
i5-750 4
+27%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 1.59
Recency 1 February 2011 8 September 2009
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

i5-2540M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

i5-750, on the other hand, has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750.

Be aware that Core i5-2540M is a notebook processor while Core i5-750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2540M and Core i5-750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2540M
Core i5-2540M
Intel Core i5-750
Core i5-750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 549 votes

Rate Core i5-2540M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 993 votes

Rate Core i5-750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2540M or Core i5-750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.