Xeon w9-3575X vs i5-2520M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2520M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.41
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.02
+3589%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Core i5-2520M by a whopping 3589% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking222230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.96
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency3.8114.48
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)44
Performance-coresno data44
Threads488
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)97.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size149 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors624 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPPGA988FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2520M 1.41
Xeon w9-3575X 52.02
+3589%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2520M 2237
Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+3594%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 52.02
Recency 1 February 2011 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 44
Threads 4 88
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 340 Watt

i5-2520M has 871.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 3589.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 2100% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2520M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-2520M is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2520M and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2520M
Core i5-2520M
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 543 votes

Rate Core i5-2520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2520M or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.