Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-2500T

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i5-2500T
2011
4 cores / 4 threads
1.89
Athlon X4 760K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
1.91
+1.1%

Athlon X4 760K outperforms Core i5-2500T by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18591854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.35no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$65 $31

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192K
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155FM2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
PowerNowno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2500T 1.89
Athlon X4 760K 1.91
+1.1%

Athlon X4 760K outperforms Core i5-2500T by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-2500T 2929
Athlon X4 760K 2948
+0.6%

Athlon X4 760K outperforms Core i5-2500T by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.89 1.91
Recency 9 January 2011 1 June 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 100 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2500T and Athlon X4 760K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2500T
Core i5-2500T
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Athlon X4 760K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 13 votes

Rate Core i5-2500T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 229 votes

Rate Athlon X4 760K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2500T or Athlon X4 760K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.