FX-8150 vs Core i5-2500K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i5-2500K
2011
4 cores / 4 threads
2.66
FX-8150
2011
8 cores / 8 threads
3.40
+27.8%

FX-8150 outperforms Core i5-2500K by 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16021457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.431.24
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i5 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$216no data
Current price$196 (0.9x MSRP)$86

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8150 has 188% better value for money than i5-2500K.

Detailed Specifications

Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C61 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.0125 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2500K and FX-8150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2500K and FX-8150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2500K and FX-8150.

PCIe version2.0n/a
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2500K 2.66
FX-8150 3.40
+27.8%

FX-8150 outperforms Core i5-2500K by 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-2500K 4119
FX-8150 5260
+27.7%

FX-8150 outperforms Core i5-2500K by 28% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-2500K 647
+48.1%
FX-8150 437

Core i5-2500K outperforms FX-8150 by 48% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-2500K 1923
+10.6%
FX-8150 1739

Core i5-2500K outperforms FX-8150 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i5-2500K 5650
FX-8150 6120
+8.3%

FX-8150 outperforms Core i5-2500K by 8% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 2.66 3.40
Recency 9 January 2011 12 October 2011
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

The FX-8150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2500K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2500K and FX-8150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2500K
Core i5-2500K
AMD FX-8150
FX-8150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1660 votes

Rate Core i5-2500K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 389 votes

Rate FX-8150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2500K or FX-8150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.