Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs i5-2400

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2004	3304
Place by popularity	34	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.86	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	Core i5 (Desktop)	2x AMD Athlon 64
Power efficiency	0.98	0.70
Designer	Intel	AMD
Manufacturer	Intel	no data
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Tyler (2007−2009)
Release date	9 January 2011 (14 years ago)	1 November 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$60	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2400 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	3.1 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	1.6 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	1600 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	0 MB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	6144 KB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Die size	216 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	73 °C	95 °C
Number of transistors	1,160 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2400 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	LGA1155	Socket S1
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2400 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNow
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
PowerNow	-	+
VirusProtect	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2400 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2400 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2400 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics 2000	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.1 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2400 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2400 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.20	0.33
Recency	9 January 2011	1 November 2009
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	20 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---