A4-9125 SoC vs i5-14400F
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 415 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 72 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 60.30 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 23.53 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (1 year ago) | April 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $196 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 215 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Radeon R3 2CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
i5-14400F has 400% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
A4-9125 SoC, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i5-14400F is a desktop processor while A4-9125 SoC is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-14400F and A4-9125 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
