Processor 300 vs i5-13600KF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
23.78
+427%
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51

Core i5-13600KF outperforms Processor 300 by a whopping 427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2161319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation66.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency12.439.27
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads204
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 4.0no data
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Die size257 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA17001700
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 181 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13600KF 23.78
+427%
Processor 300 4.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13600KF 37777
+428%
Processor 300 7160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.78 4.51
Recency 27 September 2022 8 January 2024
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 20 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 46 Watt

i5-13600KF has a 427.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 600% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 171.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13600KF and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1917 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13600KF or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.