EPYC 9375F vs i5-13600KF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
23.50
EPYC 9375F
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
57.54
+145%

EPYC 9375F outperforms Core i5-13600KF by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.007.49
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency12.3617.11
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Turin (2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$5,306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13600KF has 795% better value for money than EPYC 9375F.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Threads2064
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 4.0no data
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 181 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i5-13600KF 23.50
EPYC 9375F 57.54
+145%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13600KF 37654
EPYC 9375F 92190
+145%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.50 57.54
Recency 27 September 2022 10 October 2024
Physical cores 14 32
Threads 20 64
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 320 Watt

i5-13600KF has 156% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has a 144.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 128.6% more physical cores and 220% more threads.

The EPYC 9375F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-13600KF in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13600KF is a desktop processor while EPYC 9375F is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2018 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i5-13600KF and EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.