Xeon Platinum 8571N vs i5-13500TE

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13500TE
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 35 Watt
13.97
Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
44.68
+220%

Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Core i5-13500TE by a whopping 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking54951
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.30
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency36.4013.58
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,839

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)52
Threads20104
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)300 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13500TE 13.97
Xeon Platinum 8571N 44.68
+220%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13500TE 21384
Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
+220%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.97 44.68
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 14 52
Threads 20 104
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 300 Watt

i5-13500TE has 757.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8571N, on the other hand, has a 219.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 271.4% more physical cores and 420% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-13500TE in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13500TE is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8571N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13500TE and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13500TE
Core i5-13500TE
Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Core i5-13500TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13500TE or Xeon Platinum 8571N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.