i9-9980XE vs i5-13500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13500
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
20.03
+9.2%
Core i9-9980XE
2018
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
18.34

Core i5-13500 outperforms Core i9-9980XE by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking282329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.413.93
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i9
Power efficiency29.1610.52
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)19 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242$1,979

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13500 has 1539% better value for money than i9-9980XE.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads2036
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate154 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm2484 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1700FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85.33 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes1644

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13500 20.03
+9.2%
i9-9980XE 18.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13500 31816
+9.2%
i9-9980XE 29127

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13500 2427
+70%
i9-9980XE 1428

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13500 12289
+8.3%
i9-9980XE 11345

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-13500 8875
+21.2%
i9-9980XE 7323

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-13500 49300
i9-9980XE 58001
+17.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-13500 14875
+10.2%
i9-9980XE 13495

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-13500 4.02
i9-9980XE 2.74
+46.7%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-13500 28
i9-9980XE 39
+35.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-13500 2405
i9-9980XE 3736
+55.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-13500 256
+29.6%
i9-9980XE 198

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-13500 3.11
+40.1%
i9-9980XE 2.22

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-13500 12
i9-9980XE 18.1
+50.8%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-13500 7704
+12%
i9-9980XE 6879

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-13500 135
i9-9980XE 156
+15.9%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-13500 306
+48.2%
i9-9980XE 207

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-13500 10322
i9-9980XE 15780
+52.9%

Blender(-)

i5-13500 223
+63.4%
i9-9980XE 137

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-13500 1805
+50.4%
i9-9980XE 1200

7-Zip Single

i5-13500 5887
+15.2%
i9-9980XE 5110

7-Zip

i5-13500 55528
i9-9980XE 93018
+67.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.03 18.34
Recency 4 January 2023 19 October 2018
Physical cores 14 18
Threads 20 36
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

i5-13500 has a 9.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

i9-9980XE, on the other hand, has 28.6% more physical cores and 80% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13500 and Core i9-9980XE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13500
Core i5-13500
Intel Core i9-9980XE
Core i9-9980XE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1290 votes

Rate Core i5-13500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 102 votes

Rate Core i9-9980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13500 or Core i9-9980XE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.