Xeon Gold 6548Y+ vs i5-13400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.67
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
43.96
+181%

Xeon Gold 6548Y+ outperforms Core i5-13400F by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking44150
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.6529.55
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency22.9716.76
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$196$3,726

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400F has 98% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6548Y+.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores4no data
Threads1664
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)60 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Die size257 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA17004677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5, DDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400F 15.67
Xeon Gold 6548Y+ 43.96
+181%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400F 25101
Xeon Gold 6548Y+ 70410
+181%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.67 43.96
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 10 32
Threads 16 64
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

i5-13400F has 284.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+, on the other hand, has a 180.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 220% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-13400F in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
Intel Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Xeon Gold 6548Y+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3520 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6548Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400F or Xeon Gold 6548Y+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.