Ryzen Embedded 5900E vs Core i5-13400F
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 394 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 44 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 57.73 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2024) |
Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 20 April 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $196 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 24 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 0.1 MB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 9.5 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 64 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Die size | 257 mm2 | 2x 74 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 8,300 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | LGA 1700 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
TSX | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5, DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E.
PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 January 2023 | 20 April 2023 |
Physical cores | 10 | 12 |
Threads | 16 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
i5-13400F has 61.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Embedded 5900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, 20% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded 5900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.