i5-14500T vs i5-13400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.83
+3.6%
Core i5-14500T
2024
14 cores / 20 threads, 35 Watt
15.28

Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i5-14500T by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking433458
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.3847.14
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency23.0641.34
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$196$232

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400F has 24% better value for money than i5-14500T.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data92 MHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5, DDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.55 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400F 15.83
+3.6%
i5-14500T 15.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400F 25141
+3.6%
i5-14500T 24277

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400F 2303
i5-14500T 2363
+2.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400F 11004
+15.7%
i5-14500T 9514

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-13400F 8689
i5-14500T 9014
+3.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-13400F 51113
+28.4%
i5-14500T 39798

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-13400F 13989
+7.7%
i5-14500T 12986

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-13400F 3.27
+46.5%
i5-14500T 4.79

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-13400F 27
+26.9%
i5-14500T 22

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-13400F 2364
+16.9%
i5-14500T 2022

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-13400F 252
i5-14500T 252

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-13400F 3.06
i5-14500T 3.18
+3.9%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-13400F 12.2
+24.5%
i5-14500T 9.8

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-13400F 8602
+25.7%
i5-14500T 6846

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-13400F 137
+26.7%
i5-14500T 108

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-13400F 315
+18.9%
i5-14500T 265

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-13400F 12095
+32.6%
i5-14500T 9122

Blender(-)

i5-13400F 206
i5-14500T 288
+39.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-13400F 1792
i5-14500T 1838
+2.6%

7-Zip Single

i5-13400F 5743
i5-14500T 5980
+4.1%

7-Zip

i5-13400F 60048
+31.1%
i5-14500T 45820

WebXPRT 3

i5-13400F 294
+12.2%
i5-14500T 262

CrossMark Overall

i5-13400F 1941
+30%
i5-14500T 1493

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i5-13400F 254
+4.1%
i5-14500T 244

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i5-13400F 336
i5-14500T 513
+52.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.83 15.28
Recency 4 January 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 10 14
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i5-13400F has a 3.6% higher aggregate performance score.

i5-14500T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 40% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14500T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
Intel Core i5-14500T
Core i5-14500T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3314 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate Core i5-14500T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400F or Core i5-14500T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.