Ultra 5 225 vs i5-13400E

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1610
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)21 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die size257 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket17001851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Threads 16 10
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm

i5-13400E has 60% more threads.

Ultra 5 225, on the other hand, has a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400E and Core Ultra 5 225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400E
Core i5-13400E
Intel Core Ultra 5 225
Core Ultra 5 225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Core i5-13400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400E or Core Ultra 5 225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.