Xeon W-11855M vs i5-13400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.66
+28.7%
Xeon W-11855M
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.39

Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon W-11855M by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking487693
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.94no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency21.3430.80
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache80K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCBGA1787
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size192 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 730Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz1.45 GHz
Execution Units2432

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.66
+28.7%
Xeon W-11855M 11.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23286
+28.7%
Xeon W-11855M 18097

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400 2299
+15.5%
Xeon W-11855M 1990

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400 10208
+30.4%
Xeon W-11855M 7829

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-13400 12107
+68.4%
Xeon W-11855M 7191

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.66 11.39
Integrated graphics card 4.16 5.58
Recency 4 January 2023 11 May 2021
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i5-13400 has a 28.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Xeon W-11855M, on the other hand, has 34.1% faster integrated GPU, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-11855M in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-11855M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Xeon W-11855M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Xeon W-11855M
Xeon W-11855M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1088 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 24 votes

Rate Xeon W-11855M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Xeon W-11855M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.