Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs i5-13400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.66
+215%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
2016
4 cores / 8 threads, 140 Watt
4.65

Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4871291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.943.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency21.363.15
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400 has 1459% better value for money than Xeon E5-1620 v4.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache80K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)10 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C69 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size192 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.66
+215%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 4.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23279
+215%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 7389

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400 2298
+106%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 1118

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400 10210
+154%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 4023

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.66 4.65
Recency 4 January 2023 20 June 2016
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 140 Watt

i5-13400 has a 215.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 150% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1620 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Xeon E5-1620 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1087 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 48 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Xeon E5-1620 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.