Celeron G4900 vs i5-13400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.57
+878%
Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.49

Core i5-13400 outperforms Celeron G4900 by a whopping 878% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4922173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.342.95
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency21.382.79
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400 has 1505% better value for money than Celeron G4900.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores4no data
Threads162
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data31
L1 cache80K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA17001151
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size192 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 730Intel UHD Graphics 610
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.57
+878%
Celeron G4900 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23339
+881%
Celeron G4900 2379

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400 2297
+280%
Celeron G4900 604

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400 10191
+888%
Celeron G4900 1031

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.57 1.49
Integrated graphics card 4.17 1.89
Recency 4 January 2023 3 April 2018
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 51 Watt

i5-13400 has a 877.9% higher aggregate performance score, 120.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and 400% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron G4900, on the other hand, has 27.5% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G4900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1130 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 119 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Celeron G4900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.