Celeron G1610T vs i5-13400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.15
+1641%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Celeron G1610T by a whopping 1641% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4752550
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.886.67
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400 has 588% better value for money than Celeron G1610T.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm22 nm
Die size257 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size192 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz1.05 GHz
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 15.15
+1641%
Celeron G1610T 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23143
+1644%
Celeron G1610T 1327

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400 2298
+598%
Celeron G1610T 329

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400 10199
+1652%
Celeron G1610T 582

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.15 0.87
Recency 4 January 2023 3 December 2012
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i5-13400 has a 1641.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 400% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron G1610T, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1610T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Celeron G1610T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Celeron G1610T
Celeron G1610T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1024 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1610T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Celeron G1610T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.