A4 PRO-3340B vs i5-12400F
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-12400F outperforms A4 PRO-3340B by a whopping 1041% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 762 | 2638 |
| Place by popularity | 2 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 43.55 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 7.20 | 1.64 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) | 20 December 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $180 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 6 | no data |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 18 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 163 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1700 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| RAID | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR3/DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon™ HD 8240 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 2 |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 128 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-12400F and A4 PRO-3340B.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.07 | 0.97 |
| Recency | 4 January 2022 | 20 December 2014 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
i5-12400F has a 1041.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
A4 PRO-3340B, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i5-12400F is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4 PRO-3340B in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-12400F is a desktop processor while A4 PRO-3340B is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
