EPYC 9654 vs i5-11600KF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-11600KF
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 125 Watt
12.36
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.73
+513%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i5-11600KF by a whopping 513% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.36
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.3619.91
Architecture codenameRocket Lake (2021)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64K (per core)6 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)96 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-11600KF 12.36
EPYC 9654 75.73
+513%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-11600KF 19634
EPYC 9654 120295
+513%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-11600KF 2233
+21.6%
EPYC 9654 1837

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-11600KF 8727
EPYC 9654 18836
+116%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.36 75.73
Recency 16 March 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 360 Watt

i5-11600KF has 188% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 512.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-11600KF in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-11600KF is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-11600KF and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-11600KF
Core i5-11600KF
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 851 vote

Rate Core i5-11600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-11600KF or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.