Ryzen 5 7600 vs Core i5-11400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-11400F
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.03
Ryzen 5 7600
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.57
+59.3%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking659331
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.5145.34
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRocket Lake (2021)Raphael (Zen4)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$157no data
Current price$110 (0.7x MSRP)$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-11400F has 49% better value for money than Ryzen 5 7600.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size276 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno dataCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-5125 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-11400F 11.03
Ryzen 5 7600 17.57
+59.3%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-11400F 17061
Ryzen 5 7600 27182
+59.3%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 59% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-11400F 1962
Ryzen 5 7600 2737
+39.5%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 40% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-11400F 7589
Ryzen 5 7600 12265
+61.6%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 62% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-11400F 6210
Ryzen 5 7600 8122
+30.8%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 31% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-11400F 44220
Ryzen 5 7600 46166
+4.4%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 4% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-11400F 13359
Ryzen 5 7600 15993
+19.7%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 20% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-11400F 4.09
Ryzen 5 7600 3.06
+33.7%

Core i5-11400F outperforms Ryzen 5 7600 by 34% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-11400F 18
Ryzen 5 7600 26
+49.6%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 50% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-11400F 1574
Ryzen 5 7600 2339
+48.6%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 49% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-11400F 210
Ryzen 5 7600 298
+41.9%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 42% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-11400F 2.23
Ryzen 5 7600 3.51
+57.4%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 57% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-11400F 8.7
Ryzen 5 7600 12.5
+43.7%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 44% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-11400F 7147
Ryzen 5 7600 14038
+96.4%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 96% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-11400F 92
Ryzen 5 7600 138
+50.6%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 51% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-11400F 258
Ryzen 5 7600 347
+34.5%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 34% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.03 17.57
Recency 16 March 2021 14 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

The Ryzen 5 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-11400F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-11400F and Ryzen 5 7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8089 votes

Rate Core i5-11400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 931 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-11400F or Ryzen 5 7600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.