Celeron G6900 vs Core i5-11300H
Aggregate performance score
i5-11300H outperforms Celeron G6900 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 945 | 1580 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 16.53 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake-H35 | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $77 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 320 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 5 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 146.1 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1449/LGA1449 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-11300H outperforms Celeron G6900 by 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-11300H outperforms Celeron G6900 by 140% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-11300H outperforms Celeron G6900 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-11300H outperforms Celeron G6900 by 79% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.07 | 2.94 |
| Recency | 11 January 2021 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 46 Watt |
i5-11300H has a 140.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 31.4% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.
The Core i5-11300H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i5-11300H is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-11300H and Celeron G6900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
