Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U vs i5-10400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.20
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
9.17
+11.8%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U outperforms Core i5-10400F by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking924836
Place by popularity9not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency11.8857.55
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)19 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$155no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-10400F 8.20
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 9.17
+11.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-10400F 13029
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 14567
+11.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-10400F 1455
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 1631
+12.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-10400F 5777
+6.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 5416

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-10400F 1332
+0.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 1326

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-10400F 180
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 216
+19.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-10400F 6365
+21.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 5227

Blender(-)

i5-10400F 332
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 391
+17.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-10400F 1220
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 1364
+11.8%

7-Zip Single

i5-10400F 5064
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 5094
+0.6%

7-Zip

i5-10400F 36731
+4.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 35209

WebXPRT 3

i5-10400F 215
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U 241
+12.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.20 9.17
Recency 30 April 2020 19 April 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-10400F in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-10400F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13738 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 23 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-10400F or Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.