Ryzen 3 3200GE vs Core i5-10400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.42
+78%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 3200GE by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8461209
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.7912.84
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$155no data
Current price$100 (0.6x MSRP)$154

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-10400F has 272% better value for money than Ryzen 3 3200GE.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-10400F 8.42
+78%
Ryzen 3 3200GE 4.73

Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 3200GE by 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-10400F 13029
+78.3%
Ryzen 3 3200GE 7309

Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 3200GE by 78% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.42 4.73
Recency 30 April 2020 7 July 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3200GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 3200GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
Ryzen 3 3200GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12626 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 18 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-10400F or Ryzen 3 3200GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.