EPYC Embedded 9654P vs i5-10400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking913not rated
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.18no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency11.94no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)14 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$155no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 April 2020 14 March 2023
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

i5-10400F has 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 9654P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-10400F is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 9654P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10400F and EPYC Embedded 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P
EPYC Embedded 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13472 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-10400F or EPYC Embedded 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.