EPYC 9374F vs Core i5-10400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.42
EPYC 9374F
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
51.61
+513%

EPYC 9374F outperforms i5-10400F by a whopping 513% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking84929
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.1913.14
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Genoa
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$155$4,850
Current price$109 (0.7x MSRP)$3495 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-10400F has 221% better value for money than EPYC 9374F.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-10400F 8.42
EPYC 9374F 51.61
+513%

EPYC 9374F outperforms Core i5-10400F by 513% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-10400F 13029
EPYC 9374F 79826
+513%

EPYC 9374F outperforms Core i5-10400F by 513% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-10400F 1442
EPYC 9374F 2305
+59.8%

EPYC 9374F outperforms Core i5-10400F by 60% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-10400F 5754
EPYC 9374F 21503
+274%

EPYC 9374F outperforms Core i5-10400F by 274% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.42 51.61
Recency 30 April 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Cost $155 $4850
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

The EPYC 9374F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-10400F in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-10400F is a desktop processor while EPYC 9374F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9374F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
AMD EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12786 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9374F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-10400F or EPYC 9374F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.