EPYC 74F3 vs i5-1038G7
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 147 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 6.00 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Ice Lake | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.12 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 4 May 2020 (6 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,900 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 74F3: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 32 |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | no data | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 74F3.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 May 2020 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 8 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 240 Watt |
i5-1038G7 has 757% lower power consumption.
EPYC 74F3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core i5-1038G7 and AMD EPYC 74F3. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i5-1038G7 is a notebook processor while EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
