Ryzen 5 3580U vs Core i5-1035G1

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i5-1035G1
2019
4 cores / 8 threads
4.85
+2.5%
Ryzen 5 3580U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads
4.73

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11591183
Place by popularity88not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameIce Lake-U (2019−2020)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Release date1 August 2019 (4 years old)6 January 2019 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$297no data
Current price$626 (2.1x MSRP)$1509

Technical specs

Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1526FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth58.3 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-1035G1 4.85
+2.5%
Ryzen 5 3580U 4.73

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-1035G1 7432
+2.7%
Ryzen 5 3580U 7240

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 3% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-1035G1 6870
+51.8%
Ryzen 5 3580U 4525

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 52% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-1035G1 21299
+16.3%
Ryzen 5 3580U 18307

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-1035G1 10.8
Ryzen 5 3580U 7.17
+50.6%

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 51% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-1035G1 6
Ryzen 5 3580U 8
+34.6%

Ryzen 5 3580U outperforms Core i5-1035G1 by 35% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-1035G1 606
Ryzen 5 3580U 693
+14.4%

Ryzen 5 3580U outperforms Core i5-1035G1 by 14% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-1035G1 168
+20.5%
Ryzen 5 3580U 139

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 21% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-1035G1 1.97
+19.4%
Ryzen 5 3580U 1.65

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 19% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-1035G1 4.2
+20%
Ryzen 5 3580U 3.5

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 20% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-1035G1 3800
+30%
Ryzen 5 3580U 2924

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by 30% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.85 4.73
Recency 1 August 2019 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm

We couldn't decide between Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 5 3580U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-1035G1
Core i5-1035G1
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
Ryzen 5 3580U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2619 votes

Rate Intel Core i5-1035G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 34 votes

Rate AMD Ryzen 5 3580U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-1035G1 or Ryzen 5 3580U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.