i3-1315UE vs i5-10310U
Aggregate performance score
i3-1315UE outperforms i5-10310U by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1363 | 1106 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Comet Lake | no data |
Architecture codename | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-U (2022−2023) |
Release date | 13 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 10 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1528 | Intel BGA 1744 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
SIPP | + | - |
Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors | Intel UHD Graphics 64EU |
Max video memory | 32 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | no data |
Execution Units | 24 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304@24Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.16 | 5.76 |
Recency | 13 May 2020 | 4 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
i3-1315UE has a 38.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i3-1315UE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-10310U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10310U and Core i3-1315UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.