Celeron N5095 vs i5-1030NG7

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-1030NG7
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 10 Watt
3.60
+40.1%
Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57

Core i5-1030NG7 outperforms Celeron N5095 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14991728
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Ice LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency34.0716.21
Architecture codenameIce Lake-Y (2020)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date18 March 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die size123 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1044FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-+
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR4-3733DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth58.3 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Plus GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportYes, at 120Hz+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-1030NG7 3.60
+40.1%
Celeron N5095 2.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-1030NG7 5713
+40.1%
Celeron N5095 4078

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-1030NG7 4250
+19.9%
Celeron N5095 3545

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-1030NG7 9432
Celeron N5095 12283
+30.2%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-1030NG7 3828
Celeron N5095 5272
+37.7%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-1030NG7 15.2
+28.2%
Celeron N5095 19.49

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-1030NG7 3
Celeron N5095 5
+39.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-1030NG7 448
+23.1%
Celeron N5095 364

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-1030NG7 140
+32.1%
Celeron N5095 106

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-1030NG7 1.21
Celeron N5095 1.27
+5%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-1030NG7 3.1
+24%
Celeron N5095 2.5

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-1030NG7 17
Celeron N5095 25
+47.9%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-1030NG7 77
Celeron N5095 117
+50.5%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-1030NG7 3878
+127%
Celeron N5095 1706

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-1030NG7 2710
+33.6%
Celeron N5095 2028

Blender(-)

i5-1030NG7 1310
Celeron N5095 1547
+18.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-1030NG7 1089
+67.3%
Celeron N5095 651

7-Zip Single

i5-1030NG7 3472
+12%
Celeron N5095 3100

7-Zip

i5-1030NG7 10924
Celeron N5095 11013
+0.8%

WebXPRT 3

i5-1030NG7 159
+26.5%
Celeron N5095 125

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.60 2.57
Integrated graphics card 4.70 5.58
Recency 18 March 2020 11 January 2021
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

i5-1030NG7 has a 40.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has 18.7% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 9 months.

The Core i5-1030NG7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-1030NG7 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1030NG7 and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-1030NG7
Core i5-1030NG7
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 40 votes

Rate Core i5-1030NG7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1442 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-1030NG7 or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.