Athlon II X4 740 vs i5-10300H
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-10300H outperforms Athlon II X4 740 by a whopping 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1179 | 2053 |
Place by popularity | 34 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Comet Lake | Athlon |
Power efficiency | 11.06 | no data |
Architecture codename | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Piledriver |
Release date | 17 September 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $71 |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1440 | Socket FM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304@30Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 5.26 | 1.69 |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
i5-10300H has a 211.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-10300H is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 740 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i5-10300H is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 740 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10300H and Athlon II X4 740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.