EPYC 9275F vs i3-N305

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1074not rated
Place by popularity78not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency39.65no data
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Turin (2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$309$3,439

Detailed specifications

Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed0.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1264SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes9128
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 8 48
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 320 Watt

i3-N305 has 2033.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i3-N305 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-N305 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-N305
Core i3-N305
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 652 votes

Rate Core i3-N305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-N305 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.