Ultra 7 165U vs i3-N300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-N300
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 7 Watt
5.51
Core Ultra 7 165U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
11.16
+103%

Core Ultra 7 165U outperforms Core i3-N300 by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1158702
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency74.1070.04
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$309$448

Detailed specifications

Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads814
Base clock speed0.1 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 4 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1264FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB96 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz2 GHz
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112.2
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes912
PCI supportno data4.0
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-N300 5.51
Ultra 7 165U 11.16
+103%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
    • Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
    • Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
    • Blender(-)
    • Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core
    • 7-Zip Single
    • 7-Zip
    • WebXPRT 3
    • CrossMark Overall
    • Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)
    • Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
    • Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-N300 8750
Ultra 7 165U 17726
+103%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i3-N300 416
Ultra 7 165U 1636
+293%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i3-N300 85
Ultra 7 165U 240
+182%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i3-N300 2674
Ultra 7 165U 8577
+221%

Blender(-)

i3-N300 1095
+240%
Ultra 7 165U 323

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i3-N300 626
Ultra 7 165U 1734
+177%

7-Zip Single

i3-N300 2403
Ultra 7 165U 4895
+104%

7-Zip

i3-N300 11976
Ultra 7 165U 40306
+237%

WebXPRT 3

i3-N300 104
Ultra 7 165U 272
+161%

CrossMark Overall

i3-N300 529
Ultra 7 165U 1528
+189%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i3-N300 2147
+234%
Ultra 7 165U 643

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

i3-N300 2803
Ultra 7 165U 9530
+240%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

i3-N300 762
Ultra 7 165U 2323
+205%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.51 11.16
Recency 3 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 8 14
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

i3-N300 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 165U, on the other hand, has a 102.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 50% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

The Core Ultra 7 165U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-N300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-N300 and Core Ultra 7 165U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
Core Ultra 7 165U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4
77 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5
10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-N300 or Core Ultra 7 165U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.