Atom x7425E vs i3-N300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-N300
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 7 Watt
5.42
+56.6%
Atom x7425E
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
3.46

Core i3-N300 outperforms Atom x7425E by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11541535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency73.2827.29
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Gracemont (2023)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$309no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed0.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1264Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 24EU
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes99
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-N300 5.42
+56.6%
Atom x7425E 3.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-N300 8617
+56.6%
Atom x7425E 5502

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.42 3.46
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 12 Watt

i3-N300 has a 56.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-N300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7425E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-N300 and Atom x7425E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300
Intel Atom x7425E
Atom x7425E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 76 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom x7425E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-N300 or Atom x7425E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.