Xeon X5460 vs Core i3-9100F

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1287	1983
Place by popularity	34	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.90	0.33
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	Intel Core i3	no data
Architecture codename	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	no data
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	1 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$122	no data
Current price	$95 (0.8x MSRP)	$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-9100F has 4718% better value for money than Xeon X5460.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	no data
Threads	4	no data
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	3.16 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.2 GHz	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256K (per core)	no data
L3 cache	6 MB (shared)	12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Die size	126 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	63 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCLGA1151	LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	no data
AES-NI	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
TSX	-	no data
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
SIPP	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	no data	+
FSB parity	no data	+
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
MPX	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	no data
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	no data
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	37.5 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon X5460 by 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.36	1.66
Recency	23 April 2019	1 October 2007
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	120 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100F and Xeon X5460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---