Xeon E5-1428L V2 vs i3-9100F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.24
+7.6%
Xeon E5-1428L V2
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
3.94

Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon E5-1428L V2 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13841442
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.26no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency6.176.21
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)9 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size126 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C80 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,860 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA11511356
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-9100F 4.24
+7.6%
Xeon E5-1428L V2 3.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-9100F 6735
+7.7%
Xeon E5-1428L V2 6255

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 3.94
Recency 23 April 2019 9 January 2014
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 60 Watt

i3-9100F has a 7.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-1428L V2, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2.

Note that Core i3-9100F is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-1428L V2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100F and Xeon E5-1428L V2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F
Intel Xeon E5-1428L V2
Xeon E5-1428L V2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 7064 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5-1428L V2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-9100F or Xeon E5-1428L V2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.