Ryzen 7 7700X vs Core i3-9100F

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads
4.36

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 433% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1261192
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.9052.06
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Raphael (Zen4)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122$399
Current price$83 (0.7x MSRP)$420 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 7700X has 227% better value for money than i3-9100F.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size126 mm270 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX25 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth37.5 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-9100F 4.36
Ryzen 7 7700X 23.26
+433%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 433% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-9100F 6742
Ryzen 7 7700X 35976
+434%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 434% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-9100F 1377
Ryzen 7 7700X 2911
+111%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 111% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-9100F 3679
Ryzen 7 7700X 15268
+315%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 315% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-9100F 6509
Ryzen 7 7700X 8633
+32.6%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 33% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-9100F 18118
Ryzen 7 7700X 56024
+209%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 209% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-9100F 11.81
Ryzen 7 7700X 2.15
+449%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 7 7700X by 449% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-9100F 5
Ryzen 7 7700X 36
+570%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 570% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-9100F 634
Ryzen 7 7700X 3114
+391%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 391% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-9100F 171
Ryzen 7 7700X 315
+84.2%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 84% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-9100F 1.95
Ryzen 7 7700X 3.71
+90.3%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 90% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-9100F 3
Ryzen 7 7700X 17.5
+483%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 483% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-9100F 4052
Ryzen 7 7700X 14879
+267%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 267% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-9100F 218
Ryzen 7 7700X 374
+71.3%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 71% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-9100F 44
Ryzen 7 7700X 181
+309%

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Core i3-9100F by 309% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.36 23.26
Recency 23 April 2019 27 September 2022
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Cost $122 $399
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-9100F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 7 7700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Ryzen 7 7700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6637 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1153 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-9100F or Ryzen 7 7700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.