Athlon X4 750 vs i3-9100F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.24
+157%
Athlon X4 750
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.65

Core i3-9100F outperforms Athlon X4 750 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13732069
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.98no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency6.172.40
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache256 KB192K
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size126 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-9100F 4.24
+157%
Athlon X4 750 1.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-9100F 6733
+156%
Athlon X4 750 2625

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 1.65
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

i3-9100F has a 157% higher aggregate performance score, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-9100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100F and Athlon X4 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F
AMD Athlon X4 750
Athlon X4 750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 7018 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 40 votes

Rate Athlon X4 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-9100F or Athlon X4 750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.