EPYC 7402 vs Core i3-8320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-8320 and EPYC 7402 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.57
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release dateno data7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,783
Current price$105 $799 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-8320 and EPYC 7402 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size126 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-8320 and EPYC 7402 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA-1151TR4
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8320 and EPYC 7402. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8320 and EPYC 7402 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8320 and EPYC 7402. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 180 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i3-8320 and EPYC 7402. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-8320 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7402 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8320 and EPYC 7402, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-8320
Core i3-8320
AMD EPYC 7402
EPYC 7402

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i3-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7402 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-8320 or EPYC 7402, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.