i7-965 vs i3-8145UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-8145UE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.28
+17.5%
Core i7-965
2008, $1,509
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.94

Core i3-8145UE outperforms Core i7-965 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20132133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency16.291.60
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date1 October 2018 (7 years ago)November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,509

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.46 GHz
Bus rateno data6.4 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data263 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Number of transistorsno data731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1528FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-965 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data24 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 620no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-965.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-8145UE 2.28
+17.5%
i7-965 1.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i3-8145UE 4021
+17.4%
Samples: 17
i7-965 3424
Samples: 189

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.28 1.94
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

i3-8145UE has a 17.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

i7-965, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Intel Core i3-8145UE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-965 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-8145UE is a notebook processor while Core i7-965 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-8145UE
Core i3-8145UE
Intel Core i7-965
Core i7-965

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-8145UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 24 votes

Rate Core i7-965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-965, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.