A8-6600K vs i3-8145UE
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-8145UE outperforms A8-6600K by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2054 | 2290 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.31 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 6.44 | 0.73 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 1 October 2018 (7 years ago) | 1 June 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $142 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core i3-8145UE and A8-6600K: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 74 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-8145UE and A8-6600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1528 | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8145UE and A8-6600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | + | AVX |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8145UE and A8-6600K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8145UE and A8-6600K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8570D |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 256 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-8145UE and A8-6600K integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-8145UE and A8-6600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 11 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8145UE and A8-6600K.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.29 | 1.72 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.46 | 0.98 |
| Recency | 1 October 2018 | 1 June 2013 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
i3-8145UE has a 33% higher aggregate performance score, 151% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 567% lower power consumption.
A8-6600K, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
The Intel Core i3-8145UE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-6600K in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i3-8145UE is a notebook processor while A8-6600K is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
