Ryzen 3 3200G vs i3-8120
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1328 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 42 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.90 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.52 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| Release date | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 36 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,940 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1151 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 4.51 |
| Recency | 1 September 2018 | 7 July 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Ryzen 3 3200G has 46% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8120 and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
