i5-9300H vs i3-8109U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-8109U
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
2.68
Core i5-9300H
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.76
+77.6%

Core i5-9300H outperforms Core i3-8109U by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17191264
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i5
Power efficiency9.0610.01
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-U (2018−2019)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date5 April 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304$250

Detailed specifications

Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeOPIDMI 3.0
Bus rate4 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3024
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size123 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1528FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM128 MBno data
Speed Shift++
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s45.741 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memory32 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency300 MHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096 x 2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-8109U 2.68
i5-9300H 4.76
+77.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-8109U 4252
i5-9300H 7558
+77.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-8109U 1187
i5-9300H 1286
+8.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-8109U 2447
i5-9300H 3706
+51.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i3-8109U 353
i5-9300H 790
+124%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i3-8109U 139
i5-9300H 172
+24.1%

Blender(-)

i3-8109U 1328
+121%
i5-9300H 602

7-Zip Single

i3-8109U 3752
i5-9300H 4609
+22.8%

7-Zip

i3-8109U 9489
i5-9300H 22133
+133%

WebXPRT 3

i3-8109U 131
i5-9300H 222
+69.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.68 4.76
Integrated graphics card 4.49 3.09
Recency 5 April 2018 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 45 Watt

i3-8109U has 45.3% faster integrated GPU, and 60.7% lower power consumption.

i5-9300H, on the other hand, has a 77.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i5-9300H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-8109U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8109U and Core i5-9300H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-8109U
Core i3-8109U
Intel Core i5-9300H
Core i5-9300H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 43 votes

Rate Core i3-8109U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2589 votes

Rate Core i5-9300H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-8109U or Core i5-9300H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.