Xeon W-3275M vs i3-8100F

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.96
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Xeon W
Power efficiencyno data11.58
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2018 (6 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads456
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3625
L1 cache64K (per core)1.75 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2018 3 June 2019
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 4 56
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

i3-8100F has 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-8100F is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8100F and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-8100F
Core i3-8100F
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 50 votes

Rate Core i3-8100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 63 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-8100F or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.