Xeon E3-1240 vs i3-8100

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-8100
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.84
+12.9%
Xeon E3-1240
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.40

Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14541553
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.182.04
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency5.864.02
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date5 October 2017 (7 years ago)3 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117$209

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-8100 has 105% better value for money than Xeon E3-1240.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size126 mm2216 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C69 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,160 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151LGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FDIno data-
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-8100 3.84
+12.9%
Xeon E3-1240 3.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-8100 6101
+12.9%
Xeon E3-1240 5403

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-8100 1266
+129%
Xeon E3-1240 554

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-8100 3472
+78.7%
Xeon E3-1240 1943

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.84 3.40
Recency 5 October 2017 3 April 2011
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

i3-8100 has a 12.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E3-1240, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Core i3-8100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-8100 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1240 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8100 and Xeon E3-1240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-8100
Core i3-8100
Intel Xeon E3-1240
Xeon E3-1240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2291 vote

Rate Core i3-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 171 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-8100 or Xeon E3-1240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.