Celeron B810E vs i3-8020
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $72 |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 504 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1151 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 0.34 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
i3-8020 has 808.8% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron B810E, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-8020 is a desktop processor while Celeron B810E is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8020 and Celeron B810E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
